The decision by King Salman bin
Abdulaziz al-Saud to order airstrikes against Houthi rebels is the most
important foreign policy decision undertaken by the House of Saud since
revolutions swept across the Arab world four years ago.
Saudi
media claim the kingdom has mobilised as many as 150,000 troops to its
southern border primarily for the purpose of homeland defence, but also
clearly to afford the kingdom the option to stage a ground war should it
so choose. It is not possible to verify the troop numbers, which may
not accurately reflect the actual size of the deployment.
Whether
such a ground intervention will come is as yet unclear, but the kingdom
has decisively played its hand against the Houthis, and in the process
dramatically upped the stakes in a regional power struggle with Iran
which now involves Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain and Yemen.
Saudi
Arabia's major foreign policy decisions are usually the product of
consensus among top princes, and the Yemen operation is no exception.
Indeed, had the previous King Abdullah still been alive he would almost certainly have come to the same conclusion.
Nevertheless, this is a real test for the new king, and failure to
achieve Saudi Arabia's aim of reinstating ousted President Abdrabbuh
Mansour Hadi would be an embarrassing defeat.
Failure is not an
option, in particular for the king's 34-year-old son Prince Mohammed bin
Salman, who as minister of defence is serving in his first senior post
in government.
The risks for the young man are great.
His
cousin Prince Khalid bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud launched what is
widely regarded as a failed operation in Yemen in 2009, and his career
has never fully recovered, with the one-time shoo-in for minister of
defence seeing his portfolio dim dramatically.
Although Prince
Mohammed is secure in his post, the problems would begin if his aging
father were to pass away - the Byzantine world of Saudi court politics
would be unlikely to forgive a failed Yemeni operation.
The young prince must ensure that he gets this right. The stakes are high.
It is unlikely that the kingdom is looking to involve itself in a protracted conflict.
Saudi
troops marching into Yemen have found it tough going since 1934.
Logistics and supply lines are hard to maintain, and Yemenis know their
rugged terrain better than any foreigner.
Leverage
An
extended occupation of the country would be disastrously costly both
financially and in terms of lives, even if the Houthi insurgency was
militarily defeated.
The question is what does Saudi Arabia seek to achieve through the use of military force.
Air
strikes alone will not be enough to defeat the Houthis, and a long term
military operation would stretch Saudi operating capacity thin.
The message from Riyadh also leaves no doubt that the Saudis seek a
negotiated settlement in which President Hadi brings together Yemen's
different constituencies, including the Houthis, to work out a fairer
constitutional settlement.
This could include a fairer
distribution of provinces, and possibly more autonomy for Yemen's south
where agitation from separatists is growing larger by the day.
Additionally,
it is important to understand whether Saudi Arabia seeks a solution in
Yemen with the hope of affecting affairs elsewhere in the Arab world.
Could
for example, a political deal in which the Houthis are on the backfoot
in Sanaa be used as leverage against the Iranians in Syria to force
President Bashar al-Assad to step down from power or allow greater Sunni
political influence in Baghdad?
Iranian support
It
is a long shot but given current regional dynamics the Saudis will be
looking to push all of the pressure points they can get against Iran and
its allies.
Iran's position on Yemen is also quite clear - it
seeks a political solution in Yemen that does not involve long term
conflict and in which its allies, the Houthis, are given a seat at the
table.
But should this not be possible the hardliners in Tehran
would like nothing more than to see the Saudis bogged down in a conflict
that they cannot hope to win.
Although Iran's logistical and
diplomatic support to the Houthis has been fairly limited, the level of
the military response in Riyadh shows that the Iranians clearly have the
Saudis rattled, for far less time and money than the Saudis expended in
Syria to force Iran's hand.
In a conflict in which no side has indicated that it seeks anything
other than a diplomatic solution, it seems odd that the risk for
protracted conflict is so high.
However, the Houthis do not look to be backing down.
Houthi
leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi indicated in a televised address shortly
after the airstrikes began that all foreign invaders would be resisted.
Danger
The
hope is that while the Houthis talk tough, that they understand that
they are not welcomed by the local population and by tribal
confederations across large swathes of Yemen, particularly in the north
east and south west of the country.
So whether the Houthis like it or not, they will have to compromise.
The
danger is that Yemen could descend into a fractured and long term war,
which drags in the region's main players and gives additional space for
al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS) to exploit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment